Binomial Theorem and Mathematical Induction
The binomial theorem expands powers of two-term expressions without repeated multiplication, while mathematical induction proves statements that are meant to hold for every positive integer. Both topics use patterns carefully: one counts the ways terms can be chosen, and the other turns a verified first case into an unbroken chain of cases. Comfort with exponents, factorials, and algebraic expansion is helpful; review Algebra and Sequences and Series if those ideas are new.
Binomial Coefficients and Pascal’s Triangle
The binomial coefficient C(n, r), read “n choose r,” counts the number of ways to choose r objects from n objects when order does not matter. For integers 0 ≤ r ≤ n,
C(n, r) = n!/[r!(n − r)!], where n! = n(n − 1) · · · 2 · 1 and 0! = 1.
Pascal’s triangle places these coefficients in rows. The outside entries are 1; each interior entry is the sum of the two entries immediately above it.
n = 0: 1
n = 1: 1 1
n = 2: 1 2 1
n = 3: 1 3 3 1
n = 4: 1 4 6 4 1
Thus row n gives the coefficients for a power of n. The symmetry C(n, r) = C(n, n − r) reflects that choosing r objects is equivalent to choosing which n − r objects to leave out.
Worked example: calculate a coefficient
Find C(7, 3), or “7 choose 3.”
C(7, 3) = 7!/[3!(7 − 3)!]
= 7!/(3!4!)
= (7 · 6 · 5)/(3 · 2 · 1)
= 35
Cancel factorials before multiplying large numbers. The result says there are 35 unordered groups of three chosen from seven.
The Binomial Theorem
For a non-negative integer n, the theorem states
(a + b)n = Σr = 0n C(n, r)an − rbr.
The sigma symbol means “add the displayed expression for every integer r from 0 through n.” In the term with index r, the exponent on a decreases from n to 0, the exponent on b increases from 0 to n, and the two exponents always total n.
Why the coefficients appear
In (a + b)n, multiplication chooses one term from each of n identical-looking factors. To make an − rbr, choose b from exactly r of the factors. There are C(n, r) ways to make that choice, so that is the coefficient.
Worked example: expand a binomial
Expand (2x − 3)4. Treat the two terms as a = 2x and b = −3, so signs are included in the powers of b.
(2x − 3)⁴
= C(4, 0)(2x)⁴ + C(4, 1)(2x)³(−3)
+ C(4, 2)(2x)²(−3)² + C(4, 3)(2x)(−3)³ + C(4, 4)(−3)⁴
= 16x⁴ − 96x³ + 216x² − 216x + 81
A useful check: substituting x = 0 gives 81 in both the original expression and the expansion.
General Terms and Selected Coefficients
The general, or (r + 1)th, term of (a + b)n is
Tr + 1 = C(n, r)an − rbr, for r = 0, 1, ..., n.
The wording matters: the first term uses r = 0, so the kth term uses r = k − 1.
Worked example: find one coefficient
Find the coefficient of x3 in (1 + 2x)5.
To get x³, choose r = 3:
C(5, 3)(1)⁵⁻³(2x)³
= 10 · 1 · 8x³
= 80x³
Coefficient of x³: 80
Worked example: solve for the required term
Find the term containing x4 in (3x2 + 2/x)5.
T(r + 1) = C(5, r)(3x²)⁵⁻ʳ(2/x)ʳ
Power of x = 2(5 − r) − r = 10 − 3r.
Set 10 − 3r = 4:
3r = 6, so r = 2.
T₃ = C(5, 2)(3x²)³(2/x)²
= 10 · 27x⁶ · 4/x²
= 1080x⁴
Solving for the exponent before calculating prevents expanding five large terms unnecessarily.
Applications of Binomial Expansion
Binomial coefficients are used in probability, counting, and approximation. For example, when a fair coin is tossed five times, exactly three heads can occur in C(5, 3) = 10 sequences. Since each sequence has probability (1/2)5, the probability is 10/32 = 5/16.
They also give quick information about a polynomial without a full expansion. The sum of the coefficients of a polynomial P(x) is P(1). Therefore the coefficients of (2x − 1)6 sum to (2 · 1 − 1)6 = 1. This check includes negative coefficients correctly.
Mathematical Induction: A Proof for Every Integer
A statement P(n) about an integer n cannot be proved for infinitely many values by checking examples. Mathematical induction proves it by establishing a starting point and a rule that advances from any one case to the next.
- Base case: verify P(n0) directly.
- Inductive hypothesis: assume P(k) is true for an arbitrary integer k ≥ n0.
- Inductive step: using that assumption, prove P(k + 1).
- Conclusion: state that P(n) is true for every integer n ≥ n0.
The hypothesis is not the result being proved: it is a temporary, permitted assumption used only to establish the next case. Like a row of dominoes, the base case starts the chain and the step ensures each true case passes truth to its successor.
Worked proof: sum of the first integers
Prove 1 + 2 + · · · + n = n(n + 1)/2 for every integer n ≥ 1.
Base case n = 1:
left side = 1; right side = 1(1 + 1)/2 = 1. True.
Inductive hypothesis:
Assume 1 + 2 + ··· + k = k(k + 1)/2 for some k ≥ 1.
Inductive step:
1 + 2 + ··· + k + (k + 1)
= k(k + 1)/2 + (k + 1) [use the hypothesis]
= (k + 1)(k + 2)/2
= (k + 1)[(k + 1) + 1]/2.
This is the required formula with n = k + 1.
Therefore the formula holds for every integer n ≥ 1.
Worked proof: a divisibility statement
Prove that 8n − 1 is divisible by 7 for every integer n ≥ 1.
Base case n = 1:
8¹ − 1 = 7, which is divisible by 7.
Inductive hypothesis:
Assume 8ᵏ − 1 is divisible by 7. Thus 8ᵏ − 1 = 7m
for some integer m.
Inductive step:
8ᵏ⁺¹ − 1 = 8(8ᵏ) − 1
= 8(8ᵏ − 1) + 7
= 8(7m) + 7
= 7(8m + 1).
Since 8m + 1 is an integer, 8ᵏ⁺¹ − 1 is divisible by 7.
Therefore 7 divides 8ⁿ − 1 for every integer n ≥ 1.
Worked proof: an inequality
Prove that 2n ≥ n + 1 for every integer n ≥ 0.
Base case n = 0:
2⁰ = 1 and 0 + 1 = 1, so 1 ≥ 1.
Inductive hypothesis:
Assume 2ᵏ ≥ k + 1 for some k ≥ 0.
Inductive step:
2ᵏ⁺¹ = 2 · 2ᵏ
≥ 2(k + 1) [multiply by positive 2]
= 2k + 2
≥ k + 2 [because k ≥ 0].
Thus 2ᵏ⁺¹ ≥ (k + 1) + 1.
Therefore 2ⁿ ≥ n + 1 for every integer n ≥ 0.
In an inequality proof, justify every inequality direction. Multiplying by a positive number preserves the direction; multiplying by a negative number would reverse it.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Using the wrong row: coefficients of a power n come from row n, beginning with row 0 as 1.
- Losing a negative sign: in (3x − 2)n, use b = −2, not 2. Odd powers remain negative.
- Confusing term number and index: T4 has r = 3, not 4.
- Checking only a few cases: values such as n = 1, 2, 3 suggest a pattern but do not prove it for all integers.
- Assuming what must be shown: in the inductive step, start from the expression for k + 1 and use the hypothesis about k; do not simply write the desired result.
- Forgetting the stated range: induction proves only the range covered by its base case and step.
Practice Set
- Compute C(9, 2) and C(9, 7).
- Write the coefficients, in order, of (1 + x)6.
- Expand (x − 2)4.
- Find the coefficient of x2 in (3 − x)5.
- Find the fourth term of (2x + 1)7.
- Find the term independent of x in (x2 + 1/x)6.
- A bag has 8 distinct beads. In how many ways can 3 beads be selected?
- Prove by induction that 1 + 3 + 5 + · · · + (2n − 1) = n2 for n ≥ 1.
- Prove by induction that 5n − 1 is divisible by 4 for n ≥ 1.
- Prove by induction that 3n > 2n for n ≥ 1.
Answer Checks
- C(9, 2) = 9 · 8/2 = 36. By symmetry, C(9, 7) = C(9, 2) = 36.
- 1, 6, 15, 20, 15, 6, 1.
- x4 − 8x3 + 24x2 − 32x + 16.
- The required term has r = 2: C(5, 2)33(−x)2 = 270x2. The coefficient is 270.
- T4 uses r = 3: C(7, 3)(2x)4 = 35 · 16x4 = 560x4.
- The exponent is 2(6 − r) − r = 12 − 3r. It is zero when r = 4. The constant term is C(6, 4) = 15.
- C(8, 3) = 8 · 7 · 6/(3 · 2 · 1) = 56 selections.
- Base: for n = 1, both sides are 1. Assume the sum through 2k − 1 is k2. Adding the next odd number gives k2 + (2k + 1) = (k + 1)2, which is the required next case.
- Base: 5 − 1 = 4 is divisible by 4. If 5k − 1 = 4m, then 5k + 1 − 1 = 5(5k − 1) + 4 = 4(5m + 1), so the next case is divisible by 4.
- Base: 3 > 2. Assume 3k > 2k for k ≥ 1. Then 3k + 1 = 3 · 3k > 6k ≥ 2k + 2 = 2(k + 1). Thus the result holds for k + 1.
dispelled